There are, I think, two different ways to talk about innovation in scholarly publishing, and university press publishing especially. The first stresses what innovation can do. It’s gee whiz and emphasizes how scholarship can ping around in new ways, or become less linear, more interactive, and more collaborative. A lot of this comes from our… Continue reading Ways to talk about innovation, and ways not to
Can you guess which of the following award-winning, widely reviewed books from the past couple of years originated as a dissertation? Bethany Moreton, To Serve God and Wal-Mart Pekka Hamalainen, Comanche Empire Brian DeLay, War of a Thousand Deserts Aaron Sachs, The Humboldt Current Danielle McGuire, At the Dark End of the Street Sarah Igo,… Continue reading Spot the dissertation
A big source of confusion when talking about the current state of scholarly publishing is the tendency to conflate “scholarly publishing” and “university presses” – and, relatedly, “written academic content” and “books from university presses.” I’ve already discussed the distinction between commercial scholarly publishers and not-for-profit university presses. But there’s lots more to the landscape… Continue reading Alt scholarly publishers, university presses, nonbooks, and books
I’m always surprised when smart people advocate a passive approach to the acquisition of scholarly books. I detect a whiff of this in the American Library Association’s recent collection Getting the Word Out, with its borderline nostalgia for an era when university presses published only their own faculty, presumably without regard for conventional list building.… Continue reading We are what we acquire
A little over a year ago I decided to buy one university press book every month for twelve months. You can see my picks on twitter using the hashtag #12UPbooks. Now that the stunt is over I thought I’d share some impressions. The best part: bookstores Over the past twelve months I looked for university… Continue reading Notes on #12UPbooks
There are smart people talking about publishing on the internet but there should, I think, be more of them, and more perspectives from people who do nuts-and-bolts publishing work in particular. If you’re in that group and have something to say, hit me up. I’d love to have guest posts.
The title for my previous post emerged from a twitter conversation with Roger Schonfeld about his taxonomy of university presses. There’s a lot in the piece I disagree with but taxonomies are fun and it’s a smart post. I urge you to read it. Roger identifies a “pressured middle” category of university presses (middle meaning… Continue reading Taxonomy